Inline 300 said:
I agree with T6, you can argue combination does X but how do you know the benefits of the groove, unless you test the concept?
I also have agreed with T6 that testing one thing at a time is usually the best way to test something . . . just not ALWAYS the best way.
I also provided examples of why testing and judging modifications individually does not always give the whole story or more importantly does not reveal it's greater potential.
Automotivebreath has claimed to have tested the groove modification "by itself" and found improvements. He has also supported my position that it will enhance other modifications.
As for "Arguing combination" there is no arguing combination . . . . . just ask ANY racer or engine builder anywhere. It's
always about "The Combination"
